Okay, so I’m contractually obligated to ask about time bubbles one more time.
Yes.
So what’s up with frame of reference for time bubbles; in that obviously if you make a bubble and it’s still it’s not really still, like time moves differently but-
We deal with that a little bit in Era 2 Book 2 [Shadows of Self], where we talk about the fact that you know- obviously the bubble is moving with the planet. So they’re not– the frame of reference is not absolute.
Yeah.
And so we talk about sorta’ the idea of mass and momentum and time bubbles and things like that.
Okay
For instance you can make a time bubble on a train.
Oh and it stays on the train?!
Yes, but when you start catching stuff off of the train, it’s gonna’ jar each time, and it’s probably going to ruin your time bubble, right?
So does it get it’s “anchor” from– it’s asking all the things that are within it what they think “still” is?
Yes. That’s a good way of looking at it. Frame of reference for the cognitive things around. Make sense?
Okay; the things around or the things within it, specifically?
The things that it’s cutting into, specifically, but yeah.
time bubbles ,
frame of reference ,
Brandon on magic systems
If you are viewing this on github.io, you can see that this site is open source. Please do not try to improve this page. It is auto-generated by a python script. If you have suggestions for improvements, please start a discussion on the github repo or the Discord.